(I promised to post before 5pm)
Too much water has passed over the dam in the
past two weeks when I had first intended to once again address the status of
American Health Care. I can only skirt around the edges and hit on targets that
reflect the deterioration of what was once the best system in the world.
One document that should be read was printed in
the Wall Street Journal earlier this week which was a comprehensive review of why we are developing a double standard health care system; the one that we are getting due to "universal health care" and the superb system available to those who can afford it.
(I had a link to that article however when I tried it today I found that it is only to the present day's edition. It was too long to copy or to get permission to reprint.)
(I had a link to that article however when I tried it today I found that it is only to the present day's edition. It was too long to copy or to get permission to reprint.)
The ersatz rationing of care that is already in
existence as a result of the Nixon generation HMOs is going to worsen. The
various European socialist oriented nations that have been held as models of
universal health services have either had failures due to fiscal problems that
have resulted in restrictions on readily available services or treatments.
Even in Sweden which has been held up as the best
example of universal care there is a
developing private segment to counter act the prolonged wait, often months, for
critical surgery or diagnostic testing. Those who can afford it will opt for
this route; even though they by law are participants in the universal care.
Health care is now big business. Hospitals and
large groups are buying independent practices to control patient flow into
their hands. The number of physicians who receive a salary (employed) rather
than having a ‘”private” or small group practice is now over 60% (a 2013 Primary Care Docs)
and is rising rapidly. Economic forces and rules/regulations are a
costly burden that overwhelm individual doctors.
There have been almost daily articles in the
Times and in other news media relating to various problems resulting from weird
interpretations of the ACA laws.
Among them are certain tests and studies which are
"free" if done as part of a “wellness exam” but if done for diagnostic purposes
the “Exchange acceptable policy” will not cover.
An example if a woman has a mammogram as part of a
wellness exam it is free but if it is done to because a lump had been found in
the breast it may not be covered.
Another new regulation is the reporting of
physicians as good or bad based on group of criteria which fail to take into
consideration of extraneous factors. For example a doctor whose patient load is
burdened by high risk patients will have a higher failure rate that one in
which the majority of the patients are low risk.
Among the determining factors
are the frequency of hospital admissions or readmission within 30 days.
The pressure to see more patients per hour has resulted
in examinations practices that I find to be of poor quality but satisfies that
need to put a check mark on the chart. Today’s doctor most often auscultates the
lungs and heart through layers of clothing. That must compromise what is heard
if anything. The stethoscope needs to be on the skin to hear many heart murmurs
or lung pathology.
When I practiced back in the dark ages good physicians
could diagnose tuberculosis or collapsed lung tissue, pleurisy, by listening
and then order if need confirmatory x-rays. Today the x-ray or CT is requested
often before the chest is truly examined.
Blood
Pressure is taken by compressing the artery with the cuff and listening for the
sounds to appear and disappear. Today the doctor or the assistant will place
the cuff over clothing which affects thee pressure needed to compress the
artery; but that saves time.
Medications are prescribed not by the best drug available
but by the one the insurer will pay for even if it may not be as effective. In
many cases similar but not chemically the same drug’s effectiveness differs in
different patients but cost not results determine what is prescribed.
These are only a few of the forces which are
destroying quality of care. Henry Ford
said about his Model T; “People can have any color they want as long as it is
black”. Americans under ACA can have universal care as long as it is
inexpensive.
No comments:
Post a Comment