I am often a creature of habit and as such one of the first
things I do in the morning after my breakfast and reading two of my daily, for
lack of a better term, newspapers; is to go to my desktop computer open and scan
my email before going to my bookmarks and either opening Dan Damon’s Clips or
if that date's is not yet on line; I check Bernice’s and David Rutherford’s blog
sites.
Today was different. As you may have read that in my dotage
a new member has joined my family. At present he is placing demands upon my
time that I am sure will be minimal and routine within a few weeks if that
long.
Up to now there has been a great deal of uncertainty and
disruption in Dawg's short two years but he is coping better than expected as long
as does not have to worry about his “daily three squares” and knows that my bed
is soft. Already his anxiety state is lessened when I go out for a few minutes.
But I do digress from the subject matter at hand. Because of
play sessions amongst other morning related activities with Dawg including trying
to button his coat, I abandoned my usual routine and was not aware of David
Rutherford’s critical blog until a mid-morning call from a dear friend. It was still
later when I did read it.
Of course I did read it and suffice to say it deserves
rebuttal. However under present circumstances that may be delayed for a few
days in as much as it is obvious that he has completely misinterpreted my February
14 blog “APARTHEID???”.
I want to be sure that, if possible, I can clarify some of
his confusion. I did not think that I was to use his words “coming at” him, but
rather addressing a specific but broad topic.
On the other hand, I take umbrage at be accused of employing
“the tacky maneuver of quoting me
before adding his response” (his words). I believe that my comments were
peculiarly related to definitive subjects and could be meaningless or even ranting
without the presence of the references.
I will ASAP try to elucidate what I believe I was being explicit
in each of my commentaries. In the meantime, David please believe that I was
not faulting you.
By the way I have read all 25 pages of the Rutgers’s Report.