FU #1 MONDAY'S MEETING

 The responses to that blog was overwhelming. or continuity's sake I will cit off any more comments by 6pm tonight.  Anything not previously recorded  may be sent to his post. 

There has been enough negative commentary about the Health Officer  to warrant complete vetting before any action is  taken. If the charges and innuendos reported are valid; then of course she would not be acceptable.  A no vote  based on that criteria not "we must employ Plainfielders" would be justified.

Council President Rivers did say in her comments that she had information which she had  communicated to the City Administrator that would require a "no" vote by her.  She felt that such information was a personnel matter which requires confidentiality. I would support that stance.

We now have a week to Council must act; there  is time to get together.