I have been posting on the Israel
elections because unlike the USA which is a “republic”, Israel is a true
Democracy, and (1) The format is not one we are used to with our 2 Party system
and our direct picking the individual representing us; (2) their Knesset
(Parliament) is represented proportionally by the number of votes for
each of the parties. thus any party that
received over 3.5% of the total vote will
have representation see addendum (3) the character of the new government will have a direct impact on the Near East including the “Palestinian State issue, the Iran
nuclear bomb issue, as well as the conflict in Syria.
The process of forming a new
government there is like “Bracketology”. Since 61 seats are needed for a majority any
government must be a coalition among groups that have their own agendas and do
not often completely agree with each other. As long as there is no major
conflict among the coalition the government can function by passing
legislation, but if any member of the coalition disagrees with the majority on
a vote that can lead to a defeat for the government with the prospect that it
could no longer pass legislation and a situation that would call for possible
new elections if a new coalition could not be formed.
This is an analysis by Ben
Sales of the JTA what the new government
could be;:
On Tuesday, Israeli voters gave
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a clear mandate to form the next government.
To do that, he’ll need the support of at least 61 of the Knesset’s 120
lawmakers. Here are a few of his options, and for background, here’s an overview of the parties and what they
stand for.
The right-religious “natural
partners” coalition (67 members)
Parties: Likud (30), Kulanu (10),
Jewish Home (8), Shas (7), United Torah Judaism (6), Yisrael Beiteinu (6)
The most likely scenario based on
the results, this coalition is the one analysts are expecting to take shape.
It’s basically a reversion to Netanyahu’s relatively stable 2009-2013 coalition
of right-wing and religious parties, called Likud’s “natural partners.” The
center-right Kulanu, headed by former Likud minister Moshe Kahlon, would also
join this coalition in return for a prominent post like finance minister.
This coalition would likely take a
hard line on security and diplomacy, and a more progressive stance on
economics, in accordance with Kulanu’s and Shas’ platforms, which focus on
alleviating poverty and lowering the cost of living. This coalition, with
haredi Orthodox participation, could also roll back the 2014 law including
haredim in the military draft.
The center-right coalition (65
members)
Parties: Likud (30), Yesh Atid (11),
Kulanu (10), Jewish Home (8), Yisrael Beiteinu (6)
The haredi Orthodox UTJ has not
endorsed Netanyahu for prime minister. What happens if they refuse to? Another
scenario for Netanyahu is again excluding the haredi parties from the
government, choosing right-wing and centrist allies instead. This coalition
would look a lot like the outgoing one. It would have a free-market oriented
economic policy and would probably not roll back the haredi-focused reforms of
the last government.
The obstacle to this coalition is
Yesh Atid. That party’s fighting with Likud caused the last coalition’s
collapse, and its full-throated endorsement of West Bank withdrawal doesn’t
accord with Likud’s or Jewish Home’s policy.
The unity government (81 or 77
members)
Parties: Likud (30), Zionist Union
(24), Yesh Atid (11), Kulanu (10), Yisrael Beiteinu (6), or
Likud (30), Zionist Union (24),
Kulanu (10), Shas (7), UTJ (6)
Netanyahu has said several times
that he does not want to partner with the Zionist Union in a coalition, so this
is unlikely. But if UTJ, Kulanu or Yesh Atid force his hand, this may become a
possibility. And a wider coalition usually means more stability, which
Netanyahu values.
The first of these coalitions would
be centrist diplomatically and economically, at most enacting some economic
reform based on Kulanu’s platform. The latter would likely roll back the haredi
reforms of the last government and enact more progressive economic policy. But,
again, neither of these coalitions is probable.
Addendum from "Foreign Policy site"
Here’s how Israeli elections work: Israelis vote for parties, not individuals, in one national district. Each party puts forward a list of candidates, in rank order, and each voter chooses one list at the polls. The 120 seats of the Knesset are then divided among the lists in proportion to the national vote share each party receives, provided the party passes a minimum threshold (now equal to four seats).
The result is a highly representative, but highly fractured political system. At least 10 factions will serve in the incoming 20th Knesset, representing a wide range of ideological positions and demographic constituencies. In this system, minorities of all kinds — including Israel’s large Arab minority — are represented in Parliament, but no single party has ever succeeded in garnering more than half the seats. Consequently, coalitions must be formed, and meticulously maintained, in order to govern; early elections, usually the outcome of a failed coalition, are the norm rather than the exception.
Addendum from "Foreign Policy site"
Here’s how Israeli elections work: Israelis vote for parties, not individuals, in one national district. Each party puts forward a list of candidates, in rank order, and each voter chooses one list at the polls. The 120 seats of the Knesset are then divided among the lists in proportion to the national vote share each party receives, provided the party passes a minimum threshold (now equal to four seats).
The result is a highly representative, but highly fractured political system. At least 10 factions will serve in the incoming 20th Knesset, representing a wide range of ideological positions and demographic constituencies. In this system, minorities of all kinds — including Israel’s large Arab minority — are represented in Parliament, but no single party has ever succeeded in garnering more than half the seats. Consequently, coalitions must be formed, and meticulously maintained, in order to govern; early elections, usually the outcome of a failed coalition, are the norm rather than the exception.
A "true Democracy" doesn't feverishly scheme to undermine its native population. "But a political ideal which does not rest on the national culture is apt to seduce us from our loyalty to spiritual greatness, and to beget in us a tendency to find the path of glory in the attainment of material power and political dominion, thus breaking the thread that unites us with the past, and undermining our historical basis." Ahad Ha'am, Jewish philosopher, 1897.
ReplyDelete