Tuesday, May 14, 2013

MAY COUNCIL MEETING #1



Even in Oz the Voice of Reason is sometimes heard; however brief as the moment may be.
One such brief moment occurred during Monday night’s Council meeting. It must have been little more than a whisper because one Councilor inexplicably ignored it. By votes of 6 to 1 the Council tabled Resolution 155-13 and the first reading of Bond Ordinance 1256.

Both had to do with the adopting  an Omnibus Ordinance for issuance  of $4,845,000.00 in bonds and/or notes for various Capital Improvement projects including replacement of vehicles including fire engines that should long ago have been sent to the farm; as well as various unmentioned street’s repavement. It seems that one of the streets is East 3rd St.

Earlier the Council had approved on 2nd reading the issuance of bonds for 3 million for Capital improvements.

In the short dedicated Public Comment section before the Council discussed Resolutions and 1st Reading Ordinances; Dottie Gutenkauf pointed out that this Ordinance with the other one was increasing the debt by 8 million in a year when we still have not adopted a budget and the proposed one already had increased money to be raised by taxes by some $2.5 million.

Another citizen dear to my heart remarked that last week Council members had requested that this Ordinance be broken down in to at least two separate ones with one dedicated to road  replacement.

The Council’s action will now cause this administration to reintroduce this Ordinance in a more acceptable form at the next meeting; which will be after the Primary election.

More to follow.

2 comments:

  1. Doc, there was some confusion in the discussion of the roads projects at the agenda-fixing session. I, too, thought they were talking about EAST 3rd Street, but it turns out it is WEST 3rd Street. -- Dan Damon

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you Dan for correcting one of too many errors in this posting. West 3rd is of course most logical considering source; however East 3rd was mentioned by a Councilor.

    ReplyDelete