It is most distressing that several Council members continue to ignore their fiduciary responsibilities and instead practice the lowest level of partisan politics by misrepresenting the focus of the WBLS payment investigation
The matter of the WBLS investigation although not per-se on the agenda occupied a substantial portion of the Council meeting
When Chairman of the Committee of the Whole Reid introduced a Resolution authorizing an additional $11,000+ reimbursement for the WBLS inquiry investigative attorney resolution to pay the attorney he could not resist making a lengthy comment.
Once again he expounded upon the foolishness of the Council spending over $20,000.00 to investigate a matter of $5000.00. Councilwoman Rivers also agreed on how it was a wasted of time and money that could have been used for other projects. Councilwoman Greaves joined the other two in voting unsuccessfully against the resolution.
At the end of the meeting during public comments, Plainfielder Roland Muhammad and another citizen also vehemently chastise certain Councilors for spending money to disrespect the Mayor who had acted in an emergency situation. He prophesied that the two members who are up for reelection will be defeated by his" brothers”; friends and relatives who live all over the city.
The two Council seats up for election this year are “At Large” and Third Ward.
Those individuals on the Council and some City employees conveniently forget the fact that the investigation was only to determine if there were any irregularities in providing the funds for WBLS’s services. They conveniently disregard that much of the increased investigative cost was due to the time spent resulting from the Mayor and other employees refusal to cooperate with the investigation.
No one has answered the question of who has picked up the Mayor’s attorney’s fees or how much he was paid.
Several months ago because of Corporation Council Williamson' s potential conflict in the investigation, it was noted that a Special Corporation Counsel was appointed for the investigation; reimbursed through the Corporation Counsel’s accounts. If so by whose authority did the City pick up the Mayor’s legal costs in this affair?
These individuals, because of Partisan Politics, have tried to turn the issue into an inconsequential one of only a few dollars. They disregard the fact that the issue was not one of dollars and cents; but was instead an issue of integrity and adherence to fiduciary responsibility. In plain English one of right or wrong.
The investigation itself found that protocol and procedural rules were not followed. Indeed funds designated in one line (media) were inappropriately used for this function. There was also a question about the use of a check designated for the 4th of July Celebration for the WBLS's services.
If council members are supporting or even condoning inappropriate use of designated funds; they too are guilty of violating their fiduciary responsibility.
Guys it is well past time for all you Councilors to stop political posturing and work for the benefit of the community. That is what you were elected to do. There should be no more 4:3 votes without honest justification.
We'd much rather focus on the blemish on the apple's skin than the fruit's rotten core. That's WBLS in a nutshell.
ReplyDeleteI'm voting Democrat this election cycle, we need a change to a city government that is for the people.
ReplyDeleteWhy doesn't anyone think that they mayor had anything to do with this? We spent the money on a laywer because the mayor would not answer questions. What is wrong with everyone?
ReplyDeleteAnd, Greaves, Rivers, and Reid have a responsibility to the citizens as they are the guardians of the money - not the mayor. It appears that they do not understand their role as council members. Maybe giving them 2K to go to meetings (in addition to their 7K they get as council members), will let them know that politics should not be the driving force of their decisions.
Again, people, the mayor would not answer questions about how she spent YOUR money. Because of that, we had to spend money on a lawyer to make her. Does that sound like someone who wants the best for Plainfield or even cares about Plainfield? Doesn't this bother you at all?
And, if anyone thinks 5K is chump change, I am happy to take that money off their hands.
Unfortunately, we have members on the City Council who can't think on their own and will do what they are told. Sharon is so shady that she probably pays people to speak up for her. THE VOTERS ARE NOT SUPPORTING SHADY SHARONDA. SHE COULDN'T EVEN RAISE ANY MONEY FOR HER UPCOMING CAMPAIGN. We are tired of you Sharon. GO AWAY!!! WE ARE TIRED OF YOU!!!
ReplyDeleteBob Bolmer
Doc I was at the meeting also and one of things that rang bells for me was the fact the the lawyer whom was hired by the council never came back tothe council to get approval for additional money. I was and will always be in FULL support of the WBLS investigation, however I think the council was EXTREMLY wrong for paying a lawyer over $20,000.00 to do the investigation. I think the council did not follow their fiduciary responsiblities. I am never in favor of anything Mr. Mohammad say, but the council do need to understnd that they are extremly wrong for allowing this lawyer to take full advantage of them and they need to apologize to us the taxpayer's. Just like myself as a Taxpayer wxpected the Mayor to apologize for her wrong doings so should the council.
ReplyDeleteDoes Roland work for the City? I thought he was a part-time employee hired by the Mayor for the Rec Dept.
ReplyDeleteSeems like he has a BIG conflict of interest!
I to was at the meeting and i believe it was a shame that the council VOTED to pay a useless lawyer.
ReplyDeleteJust like I came to the meeting after the hearing thinking The TAXPAYER'S would get an apology from the MAYOR, I would also like an APOLOGY from the council.
I don't understand why we can not come together as a community so that PLAINFIELD could become what it should be. Why is it that when the other 4 council member's VOTE on a ridiculous amount of money to pay a Lawyer for doing nothing they do not want to live up to their wrong doings.
I was in full support of the WBLS investigation but to spend over $20,000.00 for WHAT? This Mayor could care less that she was wrong, but I am very surprise at the council for paying that type of money.
roland mohammad is dave wynn's flunky and yes he is or has been on the payroll for rec. He started out strongly supporting rec when it was on the hot seat and then because the mayor is also such a strong supporter of dave wynn, when she came under fire roland took up her cause. He's consistent. He totally will fight for the right to be wrong.
ReplyDeleteDoc, this was in today's Courier News:
ReplyDeleteYet not everyone expressed outrage about the payouts. City Council Chairman Adrian Mapp — who long has been one of the PMUA’s most vocal critics, even campaigning on a platform to consider dissolving the authority when he ran for mayor in 2009 — said this week that he wouldn’t have changed his vote to approve Dunn and Sanders as commissioners even had he known that they would end up playing central roles in securing the funds.