Are we who live in Plainfield
surprised? How could we be? What is
reported is the norm for the “Soprano State”. Certainly, there has been a
similar pattern exhibited by the electorate regarding local financial affairs.
I am referring to the results of a Monmouth
University/Asbury Press telephone poll which only 24% of the responders
believed that Senator Menendez is guilty of wrong doing.***
Perhaps this poll like many is askewed by
numbers. Only 803 adults were in the pool surveyed and there is about a 3.5%
+/- error in the results which would not significantly alter the data. However
65% stated that they had not heard about the issue or had insufficient
knowledge to form an opinion.
Bravo to the 11% who felt that there was
something nothing wrong to fly on a private jet and without following Senate ethical
guidelines of reimbursing the owner. Coincidentally two years later just before
an investigation began; he suddenly realized that there had been an oversight
and made a payment of over $50k for 2 flights to the Dominican Republic. .
The
trips and accompany largess were
supplied by a Florida “Eye Doctor” who has been a big campaign contributor not
only to Menendez but also to the
Democrat Party as a whole with a substantial portion going to New Jersey
candidates.
There seems to also have been a matter of
the Senator’s intervention to grant a company in which this individual has a
major interest a contract of about 500 million dollars to provide port security
in the Dominican Republic. There is no record of Dr. Melegan having any
expertise in security matters.
There are other large contracts for work in
the Dominican Republic that involved US funds for which the Senator is reported
to have actively lobbied.
I am sure that if the Courier (Asbury
Press’s sister paper) had partnered with Monmouth University to conduct a
similar poll in the Queen City the results would be similar.
Why would a population that reelects to
office candidates who continually award contracts by the RFQ “open and fair” procedure
rather than RFP closed bids find a repeated breach of ethics even consider such an individual not fit for the office? After all the RFQ methodology
permits rewarding those who contribute to personal political funds. Whereas RFP
would result in the lowest bidder getting the contract, which could save money;
unthinkable! The voters accept that public office must be a source of extra-curricular income.
We seem to admire and reelect office
holders who ignore reports of fiscal irregularities and do not investigate
reports of illegal solicitation of funds. We condone nepotism even when one
family member has been under a cloud a spouse is given another responsible
position.
We defend and praise so called public
servants who rewarded employees who after their abuse of public funds resigned
rather than be terminated with cause with a million dollars in termination
bonuses are praised for their civic concerns and appointed to positions of
power. Commissioners whose yearly compensation “direct and indirect” is limited
by its code to $4500.00 are awarded health insurance perks that can add up to
over $20.000 annually and opinioned by in house counsel to be legal.
The only thing that Menendez has done that
local politicians have not made a practice is to do it on a grander scale and
then make a mistake of a belated attempt to correct his violation in the hopes
of short circuiting a damning investigation.
* Senator William L Marcy (NY) in defense of President Andrew Jackson (1831). The biggest mountain in the Adirondacks is named for Marcy.
***Quote :"Twenty-four percent of those polled believe the senator was involved in wrong-doing, while 11 percent said he was not. Another 65 percent say they don’t know enough to form an opinion, or have not heard about the issue at all."
* Senator William L Marcy (NY) in defense of President Andrew Jackson (1831). The biggest mountain in the Adirondacks is named for Marcy.
***Quote :"Twenty-four percent of those polled believe the senator was involved in wrong-doing, while 11 percent said he was not. Another 65 percent say they don’t know enough to form an opinion, or have not heard about the issue at all."
It can be said, I suppose, that Menendez made an attempt to right the wrong by paying back the money. But that's more than can be said for the jocular fellows on PMUA's Board of Commissioners, where one's status rises the better able they are to sucker us. Half the Board is in for over $100,000 each in stolen compensation, while a fourth culprit illegally compensated to the tune of about $33,000 now sits on the City Council, and has the audacity to vote on who gets to fill their shoes. Then the one who violates state, local, and PMUA ethics rules within three weeks of being appointed oozes into the Chairman's seat.
ReplyDeleteTo paraphrase Council President Rivers, "Is it the will of the Administration to appoint the unaccountable, the conflicted, and the scammers"? The answer has got to be "Yes indeed"!