Sunday, October 12, 2008

Is the Race Card the Issue?

I never had any intention of using my blog as a political forum. That did not mean that I would refrain from commenting about abuses of public positions, funds, or trust by various elected individual or governing bodies.

I believe that I have expressed my distaste for actions of Cheney (aka Bush) Republicans, Religious Right Republicans, New Democrats, Regular Democrats, Kennedy Democrats, Pelosi Democrats, etc. For various and sundry reasons, mostly self enhancing agendas, they are all unworthy of public responsibilities. Some would destroy the basic principles of our civil liberties. Others would use their office as their own private mint. None see anything wrong in their positions, demagoguery and disdain of those who do not agree with them. Too many politicians and their proselytes subscribe to the adage that “To the victor belong the spoils”.

With this preamble out of the way, I will try to explain why as a formerly a lifelong registered Republican who has considered himself as slightly to the left of center and never a strictly Party Line Voter became a registered Democrat. The motive was a simple one; in this part of central New Jersey unless you vote in the Democratic primary your right to vote will be wasted. Due to New Jersey laws one can only vote for the party in which that person has registered. It is a good law which prevents crossing the line to eliminate a potentially effective opposition candidate prior to the general election. It is bad because the non party registered voter is deprived of a right.

What started me on this kick was Dan Damon’s blog posted Sunday. I have a great deal of respect for Dan. His position on local and state politics is more often right than wrong, and he does not merit the slurs of local Democrat leadership. His blog never has the garbage (polite word) that a local political leader writes.

However, Dan has violated the very principle he is trying to present by posting the picture of Hitler at a Nazi rally and insinuating that electing McCain would result in a similar government.

Yes the Republicans are using the Race issue in this election. That was to be expected, the Clinton’s implied it during her run for the nomination. It is no more reprehensible than the Afro-American position that to vote for McCain is being an ethnic traitor. Forgotten, is the most important factor, the person who is best qualified to lead this country at this present time should be elected.

The present crisis has made the quality of the candidates an afterthought. McCain stands less of a chance than Truman did against Dewey. It may be of no importance that Obama’s earliest political campaigns were reputed to be tainted by Chicago politics. It may not be important how Palin conducted herself as governor. They are both politicians, not “statesmen”, and none are without sin. The magnitude which we will never truly know should be a determinator.

The media is extremely biased, mostly anti-Republican, but some are vociferous in their favor of the extreme right. None have been more than superficial in examining the issues. I fear that Obama will repeat the failures of appeasement from the indications of his foreign policy views. McCain’s health program seems weaker than Obama’s, but here again I have yet to see a side by side comparison and evaluation. Both parties have been guilty of false accusations regarding Social Security. There is too much we still have to ferret out and probably never will.

If you read the OP-Ed page of Sunday's Times be sure to read "The Public Editor" ,Clark Hoyt's article titled "Urgent Issues, Buried in the Mud". His comments in my mind are more to the point about how little information we are receiving that should determine our vote.

I am sure that it will not be until a few days before the election that I will know who I am going to vote for. Then, I hope that the majority will concur in my learned opinion.

2 comments:

  1. You do not realize it, but you are being too generous to Dan Damon. Dan has a mission. Make everything in Plainfield as negative as possible. It is a personal vendetta with him. Most read his blog for thier daily entertainment.

    You are also being too generous to the disastrous policies of the Republican Party. Every time a Republican takes over, we run huge deficits. Spending does not go down, we start wars and the rich get filthy rich.

    ReplyDelete
  2. To J Spear, Thank you for your comments. We know Dan has a political mission as a "New Democrat". However, he is truly interested in the recovery of our city. From the web list of Presidents past150years and the wars they conducted. Most wars were started during a Democratic Administration believe it or not. the list follows.
    US Presidents in Chronological Order and Their Wars
    a table compiled in an evening of looking things up
    by Laurie Spiegel

    # Name Lived Held Office War(s)
    - - - -
    16 Lincoln, Abraham* 1809-1865 1861-1865 Civil War (1861-65)
    17 *Johnson, Andrew 1808-1875 1865-1869 -
    18 Grant, Ulysses Simpson (Hiram Ulysses) 1822-1885 1869-1877 Battle of the Little Bighorn (1876)
    19 Hayes, Rutherford Birchard 1822-1893 1877-1881 -
    20 Garfield, James Abram* 1831-1881 1881 -
    21 *Arthur, Chester Alan 1829-1886 1881-1885 -
    22 Cleveland, (Stephen) Grover 1837-1908 1885-1889 Apache Wars against Geronimo (1876-1886)
    23 Harrison 2, Benjamin 1833-1901 1889-1893 1st Pan-American Conference (1889)
    24 Cleveland, (Stephen) Grover 1837-1908 1893-1897 -
    25 McKinley, William* 1843-1901 1897-1901 Spanish-American War (1898)
    26 *Roosevelt, Theodore 1858-1919 1901-1909 won 1906 Nobel Peace Prize for his mediation in Russo-Japanese War
    27 Taft, William Howard 1857-1930 1909-1913 -
    28 Wilson, (Thomas) Woodrow 1856-1924 1913-1921 World War I (1914-1918)
    League of Nations
    won 1919 Nobel Peace Prize
    29 Harding, Warren Gamaliel* 1865-1923 1921-1923 -
    30 *Coolidge, (John) Calvin 1872-1933 1923-1929 -
    31 Hoover, Herbert Clark 1874-1964 1929-1933 -
    32 Roosevelt, Franklin Delano* 1882-1945 1933-1945 World War II (1939-1945)
    33 *Truman, Harry S. 1884-1972 1945-1953 atomic bombing of Japan (1945)
    Cold War with Soviet Union
    United Nations, Marshall Plan (1948)
    NATO (1949)
    Korean War (1950-1953)
    34 Eisenhower, Dwight David
    "Ike" 1890-1969 1953-1961 Cold War with Soviet Union continues
    35 Kennedy, John Fitzgerald* 1917-1963 1961-1963 established Peace Corps (1961)
    Bay of Pigs incident
    36 *Johnson, Lyndon Baines 1908-1973 1963-1969 escalated involvement in Vietnam War (1954-1975)
    37 Nixon, Richard Milhous** 1913-1994 1969-1974 "War on Drugs" (1971)
    visited China (1972)
    détente with U.S.S.R.
    eventual withdrawal of U.S. troops from Southeast Asia
    38 **Ford, Gerald Rudolph. 1913- 1974-1977 -
    39 Carter, James Earl, Jr. "Jimmy." 1924- 1977-1981 Camp David accords between Egypt and Israel (1979)
    40 Reagan, Ronald Wilson 1911- 1981-1989 military involvements in Grenada, Central America, Lebanon, Libya
    41 Bush, George Herbert Walker 1924- 1989-1993 Persian Gulf War I with Iraq (1990)
    42 Clinton, William Jefferson "Bill" 1946- 1993- Persian Gulf War II with Iraq (1999)
    Serbia vs. Bosnia, Kosovo, NATO...
    43 Bush, George W. "Dubya" 1946- 2001-2009 Afgan War against the Talliban and Al Qaeda (2001...)
    Iraqi Invasion and Occupation (2003...)
    "War on Terror"

    ReplyDelete