Saturday, February 28, 2009

ACCOUNTABILITY

If I were a manic depressive I am sure that the local newspaper articles and the blogs of the last few days would make the recent stock market activity look like a booming economy compared to my psychological status. Fortunately, I do not have to consult "my son the psychiatrist."

Where to begin? The Courier is a good place. The City will have to pay former Chief Santiago $275,000. Fortunately the present administration can not be accused responsibility for this suit resulted from action by the Public Safety Director in the previous administration and will be paid from the Municipal Excess Liability Joint Insurance Fund which will also absorb the legal cost involved in the suit's defense.

However the settlement must like all claims impact on the city's annual contribution, in lieu of a premium , to the fund. If the legal costs are born by the city that adds to Plainfield's diversion of expendable funds from municipal needs.

But this administration could have defused the suit. Rather then clearing the Chief's record it chose to take political action and with the help of a compliant Council eliminated the Chief's position. There has never been an explanation as to his operational deficiencies or incompetency that led to the need to put the department under civilian political control. The city's expert also named Santiago who testified before the rubber stamp council had been fired from more than one Director of Public Safety position within the last few years. The city had lost a highly qualified well liked Latino official.

This brings us to Santiago's exile place the narcotic's Bureau which is in rented space at $2000.00+ a month. Director Hellwig mentioned that there is consideration of moving into the Teppers Basement which the city apparently owns and on which in 2007 reportedly spent nearly a half a million dollars -. What was the money expended for? How was the contract issued and why has it not been used? How much more money is required for converting the space into usable property? Let us have the answers.

I also read in today's papers that there has been an allocation of "Stimulus money" to Essex County and some communities. There has been published a list of requests for money from various New Jersey Communities, but sadly Plainfield is missing. Where is Administration?
If towns can apply for millions to repave parking lots we certainly should have had in by now at least a preliminary request for millions to return our roads to a functionally safe for cars and humans condition.

In regards to establishing a Director of Data Processing or IT or whatever name given position with the intention of not funding until it is to be filled,I will continue to oppose the concept. If the Council approved the Ordinance it is in effect creating a potential time bomb. We have had Directorships filled in the past without Council approval sometimes on an acting basis sometimes on technicalities for a prolong period of time. Under the present administration this could be prolonged for up to 10 months.

Since creating a position following the Ordinance process under the present Council schedule could be accomplished in as few as 50 days, there is no emergency needed to create an unfulfilled position unless there are unannounced agendas. Let the Council and Administration not procrastinate, but for once investigate and then determine exactly what is required to best serve Plainfield's IT needs. We need hard fact at what is to be accomplished, what personnel and "hard materials" are needed and what is the most cost effective way to do the job. At present people are talking about "pie in the sky" and present nothing concrete.

Since I am posting twice this Saturday, I may reserve tomorrow for a few memory photographs and only "breaking news comments".

6 comments:

  1. Actually, the current administration is solely responsible for the required settlement. As noted in the correction in Sundays Courier News the Court dismissed all charges against the previous Police Director Michael Lattimore and the previous administration in 2008 with a lengthy opinion of no wrong doing found on the part of the Director. The court allowed the case against the current administration to proceed and began trial last week resulting in the settlement. I guess with a Primary approaching it is understandable why the city attorney and the current administration would like to shift the blame.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Republicans is a series of "No" votes in Washington are killing the climate of bi-partisanship in DC. Locally Mapp, Storch and McWilliams seem to be modeling themselves after the Republicans and are voting "No" without offering any reasonable solutions.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous 2:03, ther eis a difference, these three Councilors are using their heads and asking questions. Their "no votes"are following replies that do not suggest the subject to be in the best interests of the people. Often the reply is sugar coated double talk. You should be happy that the Council apparently is not going to be the rubber stamp for the administration like so many in the past few decades

    ReplyDelete
  4. Continuation; on the IT issue which we have discussed, Councilor McWilliams proposed a "road" to decide the best way to establish a functioning IT section. All the other council members have questioned various and have also in the last two months cast "No" votes.
    The American System is checks and balances

    ReplyDelete
  5. 2:13 is right. The New Dems are acting like Republicans - they are not providing any solutions. Only sticks in the spokes of progress.

    They have not proposed any solutions.

    The started this year by trying to stall standard car use arrangements. Then made no proposal to get it to vote. It took Reid's passionate plea to pry that open, else it would have been stuck in a perpetual "we need more information" loop.

    ReplyDelete
  6. TO 8:15PM. I posted your comment as a courtesy. I do not intend to have my blog becoming a battleground between the New and Old Democrats. They can do their political nonsence on their own media. I will post any comments that are pertinent to the blog for which they are submitted, unless they are in bad taste. Any comments that I deem derogatory must be signed not anonymous to be posted.
    You know who I am, it would be nice if we knew who you are.

    ReplyDelete