There are several reasons why I am posting very late on this
first and overcast cool day of October. The fact that I did sleep until after 8:30
a very rare and out of sync happening is the least of all excuses.
I had been mulling over two potential blogs including
virtual composition as today’s subject; however both are matters of generic
interest and not of local impact so they can wait for a better day.
I had been contemplating a follow up on yesterday’s blog
concerning the Police Officers who were indicted after “a months-long
investigation by the prosecutor's office Special Prosecutions Unit and the
Plainfield Police Division's Internal Affairs Unit”
I cannot shake a feeling that there could be a vendetta
motivation behind this investigation. When did it start? Who initiated the complaint?
I know Lieutenant Abney and developed a great deal of respect
for him when we both were serving as part of the elected Mayor Mapp’s
transitional team. I cannot visualize him as an individual involved in a petty
falsification of overtime records.
That is a matter of the justice system, and a hope that it
will act as should be its function. But there are more important questions that
may be difficult to answer.
Could his affiliation with the Mapp faction of the local
Democrat party have any part in the County’s investigation? With the long
history since 2006 of political machinations involving the Police Division-see
Dan Damon’s Today blog of 9/30/14 for some of this history-anything is
possible(.http://ptoday.blogspot.com/2014/09/two-plainfield-cops-indicted-in.html)
How accurate and or reliable are the Police Department
Records? Could they possibly be subject to alteration or misplacement of
specific records?
For only two officers to be guilty of such an infraction over
the past few years seems unrealistic given the implied fractional chacteristics
of that Department during the Sharon/Hellwig years.
I agree with those who write that we should not judge these
two without indisputable proof that they were guilty of a serious infraction,
and they alone among all members of the Department.
And today once again the Courier printed another negative
news about Plainfield; the cancellation of this years “Art Show”.
In the 1960s before the riots Plainfield’s annual Art Show
was one of the premier USA events in that circuit. It attracted the same professional
artists that made it their business to get prime spots in the NYC Washington
Square show; the largest in the country.
The exhibition area extended along Front Street from
Roosevelt Ave to Grove Street with extensions down he side streets to the
brook or Second Street. It was an event for
the city to be proud to hold.
Can we ever again hold such prestigious events? Perhaps yes,
only if the people and our politicians wish to upgrade Plainfield; something
that seems to be a pie in the sky hope.
I too hope the officers in question get a fair deal and if others working for the city have falsified documents, the law will be applied. I also believe that this should apply to previous people employed by the city, including the mayor's office.
ReplyDeleteI moved here in 1985 and when I attended my first art show, I was so impressed that I went every year. I really enjoyed them in the Library Park too. When Sharon took over I didn't go every year, as they became a joke. There was more cheap, plastic junk sold than art or home crafts. Let's hope that after a year to get people back together to provide a quality show to enjoy and feel good about, we will enjoy the Plainfield Art Show for years to come.