As expected the actual business of the Council was short and
almost sweet. 21 of the original 34 Resolutions were on the Consent Agenda; all
no discussion permitted and all passed in a single vote.
The other 13 resolutions plus 3 added were all passed unanimously except for
Reid’s NO vote on a Resolution settling a $17,195.80 claim by T&M
Associates against the city. No explanation for the no vote
Reid also voted against one of three Resolutions introduced
and passed as new items. This was Authorizing the transfer of a “pocket”
license of 116 Watchung Ave. The State had made a special ruling for the
renewal.
Would it not be a service to the community if any Councilor voting against a resolution or ordinance would give a brief explanation so the public can justify the merits of the objection. Without such statement some no votes could be considered pure capriciousness or a personal matter which had nothing to do with the city's involvement.
Would it not be a service to the community if any Councilor voting against a resolution or ordinance would give a brief explanation so the public can justify the merits of the objection. Without such statement some no votes could be considered pure capriciousness or a personal matter which had nothing to do with the city's involvement.
Two Ordinances were approved on first reading.
The meeting opened with a presentation before a packed room
by George Gore, Vice President of the Senior Center of all the work and
activities done there. The presentation was intended to counter repeated
complaints about the Director by one Citizen over the past two years.
During the Public Commentary; the final item of the meeting, a score of
speakers spoke in support of the Center's Director. Additional speakers included the individual
who had been making the complaints for the past three years and also a woman who or about the last three months had complained she had been subjected
to sexual harassment and had also been charged with prostitution! This person became so agitated that Rivers had the police escort her from the room.
The Corporation Counsel Vernita Sias-Hill said that the negative charges had
been investigated by an outside law firm who could not find any basses for the
complaints.
In answer to a complaint by representatives of North Plainfield taxi companies about
ticketed for picking up passengers in Plainfield the Corporation Counsel
informed that it was a state law that required each municipality to designate
what taxis can pick up passengers within its city limits. It was also noted that Plainfield had exceeded
had number of cabs per population.
AT LAST! the campaign season broke out in full force. At
least the two parties represented in the non-political BOE had a voice.
A good deal of the comment session was devoted to comments
on the political aspects of the upcoming non-political BOE elections. As has
been remarked before, for the three slots to be filled there are two slates of
3 candidates plus an unaffiliated incumbent who originally had been elected as
part of a slate.
Danny Dunn not only complained about the amateurish
presentation of the Council meetings on the City’s channels. There continues to
be a lack of synchrony between the visual and audio portions of the video. A
very justifiable complaint in view of the earlier turmoil about the changing of
the person in charge.
But Dunn’s main pitch was the lawn Campaign signs of the" unsponsored"
(John Campbell) slate which claims that they are responding to “the children”
want change.
The other slate, which Dunn must be supporting, has openly had
Jerry Green’s blessings. Perhaps that was the focus of Jeffery Dunn’s Fire and Brimstone
speech about how Plainfielders must get together and how great a man,
Assemblyman Green has helped Plainfield.
John Campbell Jr. spoke about how much he admired what his mother
was doing on the Board. And just before I left Wilma Campbell, President of the
BOE, referred to the 10years she has been on the Board and all the gains the
system was now making.
Increase in graduation rate from the depths to 69%. There
has been an increase in enrollment with students leaving the Charter and
Religious schools to reenter the Plainfield system.
Not enough attention is given to the qualifications and merits of the candidates for the bOE. Too many have just had a personal agenda relating to their children in the system.
Not enough attention is given to the qualifications and merits of the candidates for the bOE. Too many have just had a personal agenda relating to their children in the system.
I hope Wilma Campbell can outline for the rest of us what she has done for the Plainfield school system. I've lived here over 30 years and haven't seen much of an improvement. I would like to see examples of how the BOE has put our children first and know how far we've come in the past ten years. I remember working with Bob Ferraro to dump the Plainfield BOE, because of the terrible job they were doing. What has improved since then?
ReplyDeleteI had always not been an advocate of an elected board rather than an appointrd one, until the Robinson-Briggs administration with her history of political crony appointments. That would have been an exchange of bad for worse. I do not believe that the State permits any other choice. A Board partly responsible by appointment to the Mayor with a few elected members would be best.
DeleteWILMA CAMPBELL NEEDS TO GO SHE VIOLATED HER OWN POLICY OF NEPOTISM HIRING HER BROTHER IN LAW TO HEAD THE SECUTITY DEPARTMENT. SHE OVER STEPPED A LOT OF QUALIFIED CANIDATES IN THE SYSTEM. SHE HAVE HIRED THE LAW FIRM TAHT REPRESENTED HER AND HER HUSBAND IN REAL ESTATE DEALS. SHE IS NOTHING BUT POLITICAL AND ANY CANIDATE THAT SHE SUPPORTS D NOT DESERVE TO SERVE ON TH BOE
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with Bob and Doc on both points, but I thought she had more than 10 years on the board? She also had the controlling vote for a good number of those years. So if the system was doing good we can certainly credit her, but if the system is NOT doing so good we can most certainly credit her for that as well. Whatever improvements the school district has experience in the last 10 + years does not stands out against the fact that we’ve had the same leadership and controlling factor for as many years. With the same leadership in place for 10+ years the school system should be further along than what it is. After 10 + years in control, she shouldn’t be giving herself a pat on the back for a 69% graduation rate, do the other 31% not matter to her? Bob, if Wilma had significant gains, you can believe she would’ve had her son outlined them in detail. As usually it’s all about their republican party and control over the $160 million dollar budget, nothing more, nothing less.
ReplyDeleteThat is absolutely not her brother in law. They are not the only Campbells.
ReplyDeleteforgive my skepticism but did campbell offer any actual data on graduation rates over the last 5 years or on exactly how many kids are "leaving the charter and religious schools to reenter the Plainfield system?".
ReplyDeleteDunn, has a point, those lawn signs are everywhere even on property where the homeowner didn’t give them permission. And yes, it is a fact that The Campbell’s is backing that slate, you know it, we all know it. Rutherford is a nice guy but he certainly don’t have the ambition or fortitude to run a campaign on his own. Remember he ran on a slate with Wilma Campbell last year and lost. It is all about politics and who controls the budget. HOW MUCH FISH AND GRITS CAN ONE EAT????
ReplyDeleteAll the fish frying and lawn signs in the world couldn't get John Jr elected.
ReplyDelete