Norman Ortega asked me to publish his take on the public and the Council meetings. I do so since it is one concerned individual's impressions
Are we enablers?
No, we are not. We are backup dancers.
Tuesdays night's Council’s meeting was as interesting as any other, I presume. The Administration and the
Council performed a political posturing dance throughout the night. At some point the sparks and flares, in an
entertaining sort of way, delighted some of us.
This political posturing dance between the Administration and the Council reminded me of a Tango
Milonguero, with its melodramatic theatrics embroiled in its closed embraces, small steps and almost
syncopated foot work all choreographed to woo the audience.
I thought the performance was majestic and worth of an Oscar.
But no one was more mesmerized than the audience. After a long and unnecessary recess called executive
session, and soon after the grand finale with its sparks and flares, the audience was given its constitutional
right to join the dance in a section called public comments.
The audience's performance was fantastic, but expected. The audience has been backup dancing to this same
old tune for decades. They knew how to react when the lead dancers, the Council or the Administration,
improvised. Both sets of backup dancers moved like the initial phase of a Milonguero when dancers
theatrically struggle until their steps are harmonized to perfection. The bloggers are masters at this, and its
clearly obvious to behind whom they dance.
And while the bloggers and the audience are captivated by the political posturing dance and its eventual
participation as backup dancers for either side, nothing gets accomplished. In the end, like any theater-goer,
they leave the theater, with exception of the bloggers, with a sense of accomplishment, because they were
allowed to participate and dance. Yet they return to the theater soon after because in the end, even though
they had a good time and thought they received something through the political posturing dance, deep inside
its is well known that nothing was in fact accomplished.
And so, this epic and boring political posturing dance between the Council and its bloggers, the
Administration, and the voters as backup dancers for either side continues, while the brick and mortar
holding the theater falls apart.
I for once would like to see the backup dancers take the lead instead of dancing behind the Administration
and the Council. I would like to see the backup dancers and specially the bloggers from both sides demand
consensus, not undefined actions and confrontations. I would like to see, the backup dancers and the bloggers
demand a solution to specific situations by forcing the lead performers to dance their way to middle ground
(even if they in fact they hate each other) until the work to keep Plainfield Theater from falling is complete.
Voters and bloggers, instead of pandering to the Administration or the Council, join me and demand
consensus. Ask the Administration or the Council, whichever you support, to negotiate to middle ground.
Otherwise, nothing will be accomplished as it is happening now and it’s us, the voters, whom are going to
suffer the consequences dancing our way to rock bottom. "
I appreciate Mr.Ortega's thoughts. However I take exception to the insinuation that all of us bloggers pander to one side or the other. I trust I do not and Plainfield Plaintalker is a professional unbiased product. Maria's blog is the community's watchdog. None of these three have a political axis.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
You all have a political axis. It is apparent in who you choose to blame. Maria ran as a New Democrat for City Committee last election. She is hardly unbiased. And you and Bernice, though not Dan, seem to blame the Administration far more than the Council.
ReplyDeleteI do see that you have been taking a closer look at the council. I applaud that. Everyone is to blame. Not just one side.
Consensus would be nice, but it's hard to negotiate truth from untruth, clarity from subterfuge, and precision from recklessness.
ReplyDeleteIm confused....can someone clarify who is responsible for what? Isnt the mayor always telling the council to stay out of her day to day roll? arent most of our problems day to day? norman - what high level policy problems do you think the council needs to fix?
ReplyDeleteBasically what Mr. Ortega is doing is paraphrasing Thomas Jefferson when he said,"Leave no authority existing not responsible to the people. "!
ReplyDeleteHe also said,
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to ... remain silent."!
But I believe that P.J.O'Rourke hit the nail on the head with, "Anyway, no drug, not even alcohol, causes the fundamental ills of society. If we're looking for the source of our troubles, we shouldn't test people for drugs, we should test them for stupidity, ignorance, greed and love of power.
a long and unnecessary recess? PEOPLE ARE LOSING THEIR JOBS AND BENEFITS FOR THEM AND THEIR FAMILIES! HOW ARE BLOGGERS SO INSENSITIVE TO THAT!
ReplyDeleteAnyone who doesn't think Dan blames the administration (and Assemblyman Green) "far more than the Council" for everything that's wrong simply hasn't been paying attention. Dan blames the administration and Jerry Green for everything bad that happens here.
ReplyDeleteI don't know where Mr. Ortega learned his civics, but the dynamics between our Executive and Legislative branches of government our being played out in the public sphere exactly as designed by our 'Founding Fathers.' Like making sausage, making a the democratic process work is a messy thing. If you have any doubts, read the Federalist Papers; read newspapers from that era. What's going on today is nothing compared to then. In fact, I'd get really suspicious if every thing went along smoothly, as that would imply things were getting done behind closed doors in smoked filled back rooms. If anything we need more citizen participation.
ReplyDeleteThe real issue is the competence of the current administration and its appointees to run the government and follow the 'Rule of Law.'
Nat is parroting Dan's party line--no surprise there. How about the competence of the council members? Mapp approves of Christie's behaving like a "thug" (Mapp's word, not mine) about the new tunnel, which Plainfield really needs, so what do you expect from the council?
ReplyDeleteOrtega is 100% correct. This is a woeful situation. Like Fox News, our local bloggers are "fair and balanced". That much we all know.
ReplyDeleteThe only exception for now, seems to be Maria - who seems to be the only one without an ax to grind.
Everyone else: your biases shine so brightly we have to wear sunglasses around you.
11:10 NS, your comment would have been posted if it were not too personal in content.Resubmit it without the insulting phrase.
ReplyDeleteEvery government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves, therefore, are its only safe depositories.
ReplyDeleteThomas Jefferson said that, and he also stated that,"We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty or profusion and servitude. If we run into such debt, as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our calling and our creeds...[we will] have no time to think, no means of calling our miss-managers to account but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers... And this is the tendency of all human governments. A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for[ another]... till the bulk of society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery... And the fore-horse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression."
In my opinion, there is too much power in the hands of too few!
And if conditions get any worse, quite a few people are not going to like what happens . . . just look back to 1789 and 1917 to see what happens to governments that grow too large and too greedy!
Anonymous, October 15, 2010 11:41 AM,
ReplyDeletesaid:
'Ortega is 100% correct...."
I say, correct about what? There are no statements of fact. There is just an overly generalize metaphor about the dance which by changing 2 words could apply to any meeting on the face of the earth. Let us hope that in the future he will be able to provide us with cogent solutions to problems rather then wallowing around in vague generalities.
Blogs by definition are meant to be bias; they are supposed to represent the opinion of their author.