Thursday, June 27, 2013
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
ABOUT BLOGS AND BOE
In the
masthead of this blog I remarked that the purpose of this blog was to be a “vehicle
to expound at nonspecific intervals my opinions
regarding politics-local to international, health care, life, society, and
perhaps religion plus periodic vignettes about Plainfield.”
I added to
that proposition by posting interesting art works from the covers of JAMA , the
weekly scientific publication of the American Medical Association. In the early
years I also posted photos from our trips including some to then exotic places
such as Afghanistan during its pre-Russian and Taliban eras and Iran under the
Shah (long long ago).
The last few
years it seems that greatest reader interest comes from blogs devoted to local
political issues and at one time the Board of Education. Whether a subject dear to my heart, Health Care,
has been of reader interest eludes me since there is a drop in hits and few comments
received on those days.
Therefore, I
am happy that the Courier today has two front page articles; one dealing with
the Rutgers Board of Trustees and the University’s organizational structure,
the other with the legal costs and their legitimacy paid by the Plainfield BOE in the past
4 years.
These of
course plus the spate of Supreme decisions stimulate more than “obiter dictum”
as the basis for forth coming opinionated blogs.
Today,
however I shall be contented to once more express my disenchantment with an elected
board. The last decade has been marked
with a lowering of the educational standards in our system, to frequent turnover
in top personnel, excessive legal fees, absence of accountability, and an opaque
transparency by the present “political group” who control the board.
This year
with the change of the BOE elections to be concurrent with the general election
may increase the number of citizens that cast a vote but once again we have
only two political based slates to choose from in this so called non-partisan
election.
There is no
question that judging by its track record of commission appointments that under
the present administration having a Mayor appointed BOE would not have been an
improvement.
Never the less,
even understanding that politicians like leopards do not change their spots; I
would strongly advocate a referendum to restore the “Appointed Board”. There
will be accountability which is lacking today.
POTPOURRI
Yesterday
I wrote about natural disasters focusing on floods. Some have been due to heavier
than normal spring snow melt supplemented by record rainfall. The rains and
windstorms have been erroneously blamed on El Nino. Actually according to NOAA
since the mid 2010 the equatorial Pacific water temperatures have been either consistent
with a La Nina (cold) or lately neutral period so that has not been the source
of our ‘Sandys” and tornadoes.
But
did you read Tuesday or hear on the “news”; As reported by The National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
.”A Rare Tsunami Hit
The East Coast Earlier This MonthThe West Coast and Alaska Tsunami Warning Center said the source of the wave is "complex and under review," but they believe it was caused by a strong storm and perhaps even the "the slumping at the continental shelf east of New Jersey."
The weather service says that Brian Coen, who was spear fishing near Barnegat Inlet in New Jersey, saw the effect of the tsunami first hand.
He told the weather service that he noticed an outgoing tide that lasted a couple of minutes and exposed rocks that had been submerged. That was followed by a big six-foot wave.
to Paul Whitmore, director of the tsunami center.
He explained the weather system that moved through the area may have changed the air pressure enough to "generate waves that act just like tsunamis." When that happens, the wave is called a "meteotsunami" — in other words a tsunami caused by meteorological conditions, not seismic activity.”
Christie missed that.
I was going to write more today about a man-made disaster; the state of our Health Care Delivery System. There is almost some daily article in the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal on this subject. Tuesday Times article was about the prospects of a financial collapse of Medicare. The OK projections that administration gives us are based on a mandatory 25% reduction in physician reimbursement. With a constant inflation such action will drive many of the doctors to not accept Medicare patients.
That may be part of my rant (personal) when I next post on the subject.
Monday, June 24, 2013
THIS WET WORLD
“Tis the
wrath of (the) God(s) or just another unusual year for natural disasters.
Although
not a “disaster” Ne w Jersey had an earthquake last week. Of course you had to
be almost standing on top of it to have felt it.
I am not
going to dwell on the “wind” related storms, or the extraordinary large number
of wild fires that have plagued the American West and earlier Australia this
year.
Instead 2013
may be remembered as the year of the floods. Not so much in the US where with
the exception of earlier flooding of the upper Mississippi which necessitated a
stoppage of shipping, Only West Texas had severe enough flooding that Two women died in severe flooding in San
Antonio, which had been hit by torrential rains.
Severe flooding has been a worldwide phenomenon this May
and June. In Europe, although the Rhine was not affected badly this year Shipping
was halted on extensive stretches of the Rhine, Main,
and Neckar
rivers.
The
two river systems that did have major flooding were the Elbe and the Danube.
The Elbe and its tributaries, the Saale
(Germany) and the
Vltava (Czech Republic) experienced severe
flooding, Prague esplanades were under water, as was central areas of Dresden
among other cities.
Even worse was the Danube system. Austria had seen 2 months’ of rain fall in 24 hours. The
historic centre of Passau, where the Danube, Inn and Ilz
converge, was underwater with the highest recorded levels in history. Also
impacted were Budapest and Bratislava;
s were other river towns.
Australia too had major
flooding this In January 2013, ex-Tropical Cyclone Oswald and associated monsoon trough passed over
parts of Queensland and New South Wales.
Just this
past week Calgary, Alberta city center was submerged Alberta, Canada, experienced heavy rainfall that triggered catastrophic
flooding described by the provincial government as the worst in Alberta's
history. Areas along the Bow, Elbow,
Highwood,
Red Deer,
Sheep and South Saskatchewan rivers and their
tributaries were particularly affected.
In June
2013, the North Indian
states of Uttarakhand
and Himachal Pradesh, some regions of Western Nepal
and their adjoining areas experienced heavy rainfall that triggered devastating
floods and landslides, As of 22 June 2013, more than 1,000 people
have died with many more missing
The flooding
has not been limited to the north in India. Parts of Haryana,
Delhi
and Uttar Pradesh,
and some parts of Western Tibet also experienced heavy rainfall. This included
the Ganges River.
The 2013 Jakarta
flood is a flooding of Jakarta, the capital of Indonesia,
and affected several other areas surrounding the city, such as West Java
and Banten.
Severe flooding is reported to have hit Jakarta on
numerous occasions in the past, including in 1621, 1654, 1918, 1942, 1976,
1996, 2002 and 2007. An important part of the flooding problem is caused by the
fact that a substantial part of Jakarta is low-lying. Around 24,000 ha (about
240 square km) of the main part of Jakarta is estimated to be below sea level. Flooding
can become severe if heavy rains happen to coincide with high tides.
Other parts of the world that have had flood disasters
this year include Buenos Aires Province, Argentina,
and the. Greater La Plata region at least 86 reported deaths. And Greater Buenos Aires reported 8 deaths and
is said to be the worst flooding in La Plata's
history.
In Columbia 140,000 people have been affected by floods
and landslides. Almost 700 homes were destroyed and over 14,000 damaged. The
most affected areas were on the Pacific Coast in Chocó.
Africa had to participate; Mozambique has had severe rainstorms this year with destructive flooding and many deaths.
AHCA AND YOU #3
Somerset Hospital merges with RWJUH; Hunterdon Medical
Center affiliates with the Atlantic Health Systems. The latter differs from a
complete merger in that Hunterdon will keep its individual corporate identity and
separate medical staff yet all services in both organizations will be
commonly available. The Somerville merger will mean that the hospital will be
absorbed by RWJUH.
These two actions announced last week is symptomatic of
the extreme changes taking place in the health care industry.
I use the term industry advisably since the change from
delivery of health care to an industry which began with the advent of the HMO
era and the domination of health care by the insurance companies is entering
the ultimate stage of commercialization.
The trend of hospital mergers is only part of the
process. The days of the Non-profit hospital seems to be in its final
existence. For profit commercial hospitals are replacing the traditional
non-profit institutions which are in increasing financial difficulty.
This radical
restructuring in the Health delivery system is not limited to institutions; the
basis of care which once started in the
physician’s office has become a dinosaur.
Not only has the solo doctor’s practice
become obsolete in favor of groups; but the groups are in increasing numbers
abandoning their independence by becoming units in Hospital controlled mega
groups.
Is all of this
interconnected? The answer is yes. Then the questions are; why, what is the
cause, and what is the impact on you the patient.
The why is the simplest to answer; dollars and
cents. Years ago Health Insurance was designed
to help pay for the cost of extraordinary medical expenses.
Medicare and Medicaid determined reimbursement rates for
specific but limited elements of society. As Socialism in health care took hold
the impact of the HMOs started the revolution which for better or worse is the
state of patient care in the second decade of the 21st Century.
The HMOs (Insurance Companies) not only tied up the
people they would service; but determined where they would get care. That
included not only the doctors but also the hospitals and institutions that were
available to the members of the HMO. Moreover they set “take it or leave it”
low fees which often were below Medicare’s. Some carriers even used Medicaid
reimbursement which was below economic survival as their base.
The cause is the concept of Socialism which has
dominated political philosophy for much of the post WWII Baby Boomers world. There
is no denial that the concept is meritorious, but the impact of the application
has not been anticipated.
For Obama care to be practical there has to be a definitive
balance between income and expenses. There
are four ways to accomplish this: (1) Increase income by raising (a) insurance
premiums, (b) taxation increases ;( 2) lower payouts –reimbursement schedules;
(3) limit services; or (4) any combination of the above.
The one element that is politically unacceptable is to
raise taxes; so that will be the last resort.
Insurance premiums will be raised since there will be
increased demand and usage of services if it does not cost the participant. The
insurers are not in the game because they love humanity; profit is the word.
Reimbursement rates are already below market level. This
is one of the driving forces that are causing the changes in hospital
configuration. Merges are for better cost controls and eliminating reduplicated
services. Also it can by sharing assets limit the available resources which are a form of rationing
services. Also they will further reduce personnel to bare minimums. All this will compromise quality
of care.
Hospitals that do not have a positive merger and whose
major patient base is Medicaid or uninsured will not survive ala Muhlenberg.
Once a hospital has been closed the probability of it
ever being replaced even in a restricted form is almost nil. The local population
base is usually incapable of supporting a non-profit institution. State and/or
Federal funding are unlikely since both have dangerously overextended their
resources. If the federal government should default on even a portion of its
debt there will be runaway inflation.
The time to have sought a commercial for profit
corporation to take over the hospital was lost by perhaps deliberate local
political inaction and ignoring the at least two that expressed an interest
when JFK’s action became apparent.
Now-a-days even Physician
groups cannot afford the additional expenses imposed upon them by laws. The
electronic health records are, contrary to the social pundits, a failure. The
systems are expensive to install and maintain (yearly fees). To enter the data
in the computer the doctor must either ignore the patient if doing so
concurrent with the visit or take extra time afterwards. Different systems do
not speak with each other. Much of the data entered by check list is garbage,
and has to be repetitive.
One result has been the increased isolation of a physician
from the patient and the greater reliance on less well trained Nurse Practitioners
and/or Physicians Assistants. Please understand that there are many excellent
NPs and PAs but they do not have the broad education exposure that doctors must
have. That has to reflect in the level of care.
Another negative impact on patient care is the fragmentation of care. No longer is there the one on one doctor/patient relationship that persists throughout an illness. There will be different care givers in a hospital from those in the outside world.
With the change in the physician’s role from a self
employed or small group partner to an employed member of a large professional
unit has also resulted in a marked psychological alteration in the patient/physician
relationship.
Gone is the intra-personal intimacy that in my era made
the practice of medicine a pleasure. Physicians liked their patients and
patients trusted their doctors. Many considered their physician to be a close
friend and advisor. The patient was a person not a case number or first name. The openness that existed impacted on the
response to treatment.
The “conversational” office visit that had a positive
impact on patient care is no longer possible. There is pressure to accommodate
large numbers of patients, so there is a production approach to the visit.
Skipping, the first visit paperwork, on a typical visit the initial contact is
with an aid who does the routine questioning, and vital signs. Then the doctor
comes in reviews the chart, asks a few questions, may check the portion of the
body that caused you to seek attention and order more tests or prescribe
medication.
This is in part only a fraction of the changes that are
going to accelerate in 2014.
Much of the
material I have used for resources comes from the Wall Street Journal which is
of course far to right and reactionary. However, there is also a great deal of commentary in the New York
Times; both in its news columns as well as
by slanted op-ed writers. All are worthy of reading. In this Sunday’s
(6/23/13) Times on the first page there is an article A Louisville Clinic Races to Adapt to
the Health Care Overhaul with the heading “Remaking Medicine” .It is
very informative.
I hope that you have read the first two in this series, and that they have made some sense. I have more planned to follow.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)