Sad state of
affairs; after a lousy Fourth and then a weekend out of this world I must
return to blogging. Not that I do not enjoy expressing my viewpoint, but the
August Dog Day’s Doldrums have spread to encompass July.
Fortunately
tonight is the Council Agenda Fixing session. Although I was not able to review
the source material; the Resolutions portion of the packet seems to be
non-controversial. Out of 19, there are 6 that are for renewal of liquor
licenses that is 25%.
There are
also 8 petitions for street or park closures which most likely will not cause
any negative discussion and will be on the business agenda as resolutions.
However two are for August 9th and will require closure of streets
in the downtown area.
The big item
is a discussion about parking lot #9 and another city owned lot. These properties
were the subject of a hearing last October when a consortium of a private
developer, the Housing Authority, and the Plainfield Community Development Corporation
wanted to place 96 substandard low income apartments in 3 buildings on that
property.
At the same
time a private developer has proposed what appears to be an attractive and innovative
project. For the property.
The
stumbling block is that the city owns the properties and would have to transfer
(sell?) them to whoever is going to develop them.
It is this observer’s
opinion that the last thing Plainfield needs is more low income apartments in
the downtown area or anywhere else in the city with the exception of replacing antiquated
units. Certainly with the Housing Authority’s track record in regards to
Liberty Village I would question their managership of rental units.
On the other
hand the private developer’s plan could be a progressive one in revitalizing the
downtown area.
It would be logical for the Director of Community Development to study whatever projects are on the horizon and recommend the one that would b e best for Plainfield. I am afraid that this Council is too politically directed to make an unbiased decision.